Bloc undermines global peace by pursuing expansionist strategy, advancing US agenda

Although NATO, which is observing its 75th anniversary, survived the Cold War, it has long ceased playing the role of a mutual defense organization that prevents crisis and deters wars.

For instance, NATO could not prevent the Russia-Ukraine conflict despite the United States being aware of all the developments that led to the conflict. In fact, US President Joe Biden repeatedly warned of a looming conflict, yet neither Washington nor NATO addressed Russia’s genuine concerns to prevent hostilities.

READ MORE: China slams NATO's 'Cold War mentality'

Even Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky did not take the US’ early warnings seriously. He believed that Russian President Vladimir Putin would not launch the “special military operation” against Ukraine. More importantly, Biden stressed that even if a conflict broke out, the US military would not enter the territory of Ukraine to protect the country. Accordingly, no US ground forces have landed in Ukraine to “protect” it against Russia.

However, it is weird that the US promised to deter conflict without deterring “aggression”.

Washington says that since Ukraine is not a member of NATO, the US and other NATO member states are not legally bound to send their forces to “defend” Ukraine. But in 1950, the US sent its forces to the Korean Peninsula to defend the then pro-US government in the Republic of Korea long before Washington and Seoul established their alliance. The US may claim that it was a UN mission, but its forces entered Iraq in 2003 without any UN mandate.

Washington committed a series of strategic errors. It sent its forces into Iraq without any legitimate reason. Its “pro-democracy” push in the Middle East made the region more unstable, and it suddenly withdrew its forces from Afghanistan after almost 20 years of occupation in August 2021, causing chaos in the country. Also, it encouraged NATO to expand eastward to create favorable conditions for Ukraine to join the military alliance.

At the US-Russia summit in Geneva in 2021, Biden refused to assure Putin that NATO will not expand eastward anymore. After the Russia-Ukraine conflict broke out, the US has kept claiming that Ukraine’s application for NATO membership has to wait for “the end of the war”. Recently, it said that Ukraine must fulfill some conditions for accession, including tackling corruption.

All this suggests the US has not had a coherent strategy in the last two decades to prevent or deter conflicts.

If the US wants to maintain its leadership position, it should work with other countries to ensure NATO plays its original role of a defensive organization, and prevents conflicts and wars while respecting countries sensitive to NATO’s expansion. As for Russia, it should adhere to the UN Security Council resolutions and UN procedures to receive international endorsement for its operations and missions.

NATO’s regression indicates its decline as a stabilizing organization in Europe. Regrettably, the bloc seems unaware of its regression, as it has been making unnecessary remarks about East Asia.

NATO’s expansion seems no longer limited to Europe, as it is eager to step into East Asia. In fact, NATO is inviting some East Asian countries to some of its dialogue, consultation and sharing mechanisms. Although all NATO member states have official, diplomatic ties with Beijing and most of them adhere to the one-China policy that there is only one China and Taiwan is an integral part of China, NATO has often hyped up the “China threat” theory to serve the US’ interests.

ALSO READ: NATO and the deadly strategy of neoconservatism

NATO seems to be committing mistakes again, this time in East Asia. By continuing its eastward expansion and blindly supporting Ukraine, NATO has unnecessarily upset Russia, and is fueling conflicts instead of resolving disputes and preventing crises.

Worse, the attempts of the US-led West, including NATO, to compare the Ukraine crisis with the Taiwan question are deplorable and dangerous. The Taiwan question is totally different from the Ukraine crisis. Taiwan is an integral part of China, and relations across the Taiwan Strait are China’s internal matter which brooks no interference. If NATO keeps interfering in China’s internal affairs, China would be compelled to take appropriate countermeasures.

The author is professor emeritus and former executive dean at the Institute of International Studies, Fudan University. 

The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.