EU should seek Chinese electric-vehicle ventures within the bloc, rather than impose tariff curbs

On June 12, the EU announced additional duties of up to 38.1 percent on imported Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) from next month. Such a decision on Chinese-made EVs including those manufactured by BYD, Geely, and SAIC is about competitiveness, not government subsidies, period. It is about politics, as opposed to economics.

The European Union has alleged that possible government assistance to Chinese auto makers and exporters would unfairly afford the entities an advantage, causing severe harm to the EU’s auto industry.

READ MORE: China says EU asked for 'unprecedented' information in EV probe

But the paradox is that the EU auto manufacturers supposed to be harmed by Chinese EV exports are mostly opposed to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s political pet project against China. In fact, the entire German auto industry is against it, which is understandable given that Volkswagen and BMW are the workhorses that import EVs from China.

The dirty secret about this issue that von der Leyen does not want to talk about is that more than 50 percent of the EVs China exports to the EU are actually produced by Western auto giants such as Tesla, BMW, Volkswagen and Renault.

For example, despite France demanding that extra tariffs be imposed on EVs imported from China, one of the best-selling, and probably most affordable, EVs in the European market is actually made by France-based Renault’s joint venture company in China and sold in Europe under its Dacia marque. Renault, for the record, opposed the EU investigation into Chinese-made EVs.

According to the World Trade Organization’s anti-dumping and countervailing rules, subsidies that constitute an apparent WTO violation should contain two elements: one, subsidies should directly pertain to exports; and two, they should be received directly during the production stage, that is, the manufacturing stage. But neither element is apparent in this case.

First, there is no specific evidence of the Chinese government giving exports-specific subsidies to Chinese EV makers. Logically speaking, one would expect Chinese-made EVs sold in the EU to be less expensive than the ones sold at home if such exports-specific subsidies were indeed given to the EV makers. In reality, however, the exact opposite is true.

Second, the so-called government subsidies to EV makers that Western leaders and media are talking about are mostly incentives provided by local governments to consumers — something that the EU also does — R&D institutions specializing in basic research, product development firms and manufacturing plants. Such subsidies fall in the gray area under the WTO’s countervailing rules, and are usually litigated through the global trade body’s dispute settlement mechanism.

And even if such types of government aid were given to Chinese EV makers, the value apportioned to each EV exported to Europe would be so small that a comparable tariff would not be more than a few euros per EV, exposing the farce being played out by the EU.

But why play out this farce? In 2023, more than 9 million renewable energy cars were sold in China, with about 6 million of them being EVs. During the year, China exported only 455,000 EVs to Europe, and about half of those were made by Western automakers operating in China, such as Tesla, Renault, BMW, and Volkswagen.

EU governments, especially the Emmanuel Macron government in France, want to impose extra tariffs on Chinese-made EVs not because Chinese EV makers get government subsidies but because EU leaders fear that Chinese EVs would outcompete their EU counterparts.

The auto industry is not just an economic matter. It is a political matter, too, because of its deep value chain that involves an extensive manufacturing base with hundreds of ancillary companies and hundreds of thousands of workers.

ALSO READ: EU should take a step back so it can see that it is barking up wrong tree

But the EU’s attempt to ease out Chinese EV companies from the domestic market is not a viable strategy. The right strategy would be to embrace and compete against them, as Volkswagen, BMW, and Renault have done. The entire European auto industry needs a complete transformation to be able to catch up with China’s EV industry. Another good strategy would be to forge partnerships with Chinese companies, the same way that the latter did with EU companies starting in the late 1980s.

The Chinese side is open to the idea of moving some of its manufacturing bases to Europe in cooperation with its traditional EU partners. The Chinese battery-manufacturing companies will follow suit. This joint-venture model is in the best interest of both sides, because it would prevent the loss of jobs and create new commercial opportunities in Europe. The proven recipe of success in China can be used to benefit Europe, too.

The author is a professor at the University of International Business and Economics. 

The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.